Market Intelligence: -Suppliers
Flight School Management Software Aviatize Selected by UK Based Flight Training London
Aviatize, a provider of flight school management solutions, has announced the addition of Flight Training London to its growing family of flight schools. This partnership is a significant step towards:
- Enhancing student follow-up
- Workflow efficiency
- Compliance
- Overall ease of use for the flight school
With Aviatize’s innovative platform, Flight Training London is poised to revolutionize its operational capabilities, providing a superior training experience for students and instructors alike.
Source: Aviatize
Photo Credit: Aviatize
Related Posts
US Helicopter Flight Training Provider Introduces Advanced Flight Simulator in California
Related Posts
International Aviation Recruitment Consultancy, Aerviva, Shares Insights on Pilot Interviews
Dubai, United Arab Emirates-headquartered aviation recruitment firm Aerviva has shared its insights on pilot interviews. Check out their article below entitled “How pilot interviews work differently”.
“After Investing in the education for certification and being tested by flight instructors, all pilots will inevitably encounter a moment to test the measure of their convictions for flight that had motivated the training thus far. If done properly, there are truly only a few moments more validating than a pilot’s first interview with an airline. From application to agreement for work, interview processes can take several months as airlines and operators will take time to review applications and schedule interviews based on their capacity to train. Any successful pilot will encounter numerous interviews during their career progression, so we have provided insights on how to best navigate the process.
As everyone in the industry knows, Boeing’s pilot and technician outlook calls for the creation of more than 674.000 pilots over the next 20 years, making it appear as though it would be simple for qualified pilots to be placed with an airline. While the market demand for more pilots exists, airlines are limited by aircraft, and air traffic control capacity, as well as their own ability to train.
For example, British Airways advertises that it would fund up to 200 positions for its Speedbird pilot academy. The Speedbird Academy program itself works through a number of partner flight schools including L3 Harris, and Skyborne. This past March, Skyborne reported that it had seen more than 20,000 applications for its academy. The competitive nature for this pilot selection process means failure rates can be anywhere between 50% and 90%.
Each carrier will have their own interview process, and we have spoken to a number of successful candidates who have provided us with feedback on their selection process experience.
Each process will begin with some sort of organizational flow, to sort qualified applicants. There are a few different pathways to earn qualification as a pilot, and interviews sometimes take place during education, prior to checkride. The European Aviation Safety Agency has done a lot of work to harmonize its training program with US regulation part 121. These regulations generally add formulaic processes to pilot training and interviews. When aviation academies and training centers have established agreements with airlines, applicants don’t necessarily need to possess their commercial pilot ratings for the interview. The biggest effect of this difference will be on the flow of the onboarding process with the airline, as each airline will have its own “class” of new hire pilots, and the first interview will hopefully establish a flow towards the airlines respective onboarding process.
The first questions of pilot interviews will have a similar nature to questions expected of any other job interview and are a key opportunity to provide insights into one’s behavior. Competent pilots will prove that they can answer questions directly and are assured in their reply. This information is key to understanding the seriousness of a potential pilot, and compatibility with the recruiting manager’s goals for their company culture. The first questions are like the first communication to air traffic control when entering new airspace. The goal of first communication will be to announce who you are, address who you are speaking to, and communicate intentions. Common questions such as “Tell us about yourself” are an opportunity for applicants to communicate that they are a responsible qualified applicant, acknowledge the airline in a matter that complements the idea of working together, and state the goal of being a part of that airline’s cohort of aircrew.
For every qualified candidate, there will likely be a number of interviews and associated checkrides to prove one’s skills. The number of interviews a pilot will go through may not be entirely distinctive from any other job, however there is a commitment to an onboarding and recruitment process that is unique to aviation. Boeing’s 2023 update to its pilot and technician outlook predicts a demand for 674,000 new commercial pilots over the next 20 . Due to pilot shortages, each airline will have its own work force development scheme to take qualified recruits to flow onto the flight deck at planned pace.
While the the first interviews are usually one-on-one, this doesn’t mean panel interviews are irregular. Infact, some airlines will conduct interviews as potential class members for an academy, something unique to the industry. Just as the workload in the flight deck can come from multiple sources at once, the panel interview is a great way for pilots to demonstrate efficiency in balancing multiple tasks and communicating while not losing focus.
On certain occasions in the interview process, applicants can be expected to work with other potential pilots in a group, or pool. Pool interviews are more often accomplished at large flight schools and requisite spots in applicable airline training academies.
At a certain point in the interview process, the interview questions will be expected to contain more technical and industry-specific information. For example, during a pool interview at a major IAG airline, groups of an academy class were asked to make a go/no-go decision for a planned flight toward a fictional destination. Pilots will be given weight and balance, fuel information, and asked to plan their flights. During early rounds of pilot interviews, air crew can also expect to be asked technical information for aircraft they have flown previously, including: What is proper propeller pitch for a 700 ft climb at 12,000 ft MSL? Or how is calculated takeoff performance calculated and displayed? These technical questions will test your knowledge of standard operating procedures for your aircraft.
During each step of the interview, pilots can expect their counterparts on the other end of the table to gather information. Applicants should be prepared and pay attention to the roles of the airline’s representatives. During interviews with check airmen, the best practice is to give the airmen the information they would want if the applicants were to be flying with them. Just as the key to a good landing begins with a good approach, the technical portion of the interview is the essential first step of a good subsequent check ride.
Interview processes can also include simulator time. Simulators are an important part of life as a pilot, as the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has regulations requiring simulator training be conducted at least every 12 months. In recent years, simulator time can be different, or replaced for another work test as time in the simulator is an increasingly scarce commodity. If pilot interviews include simulator time, pilots should take advantage of the opportunity to demonstrate crew resource management. For this simulator time, you will likely be given a packet of information and assigned a fellow applicant. Currently, it’s important not to think of this fellow applicant as your competition, but as your aircrew. If you can work well with your fellow applicants, it will tell your airline that you can work well with their crew.
Additionally, the time in a simulator is an important opportunity to demonstrate one’s ability to be taught. Successful applicants will need to go through training for the airline that has contracted them to fly, so it’s important that pilots demonstrate their ability to receive training during the simulator time. Airlines will make simulators difficult and challenging and that’s on purpose, asking questions helps here. The most common mistake would be forgetting a call out, pilots should make every effort to make callouts to utilize crew resource management.
Pilots will receive binders of information prior to simulator time. It’s important to study this information and review it with your crew members during your simulator time before the start of the interview. Airlines such as Ryanair have published video tutorials for their simulator examination, which stress the importance of callouts and procedure.
The interview is an important part of any career development. For pilots, these interviews can open lifetimes of opportunities that are predicated upon access to future qualifications and aircraft type-ratings. These interviews will follow a pattern, and flow for success. Aerviva wishes all of its candidates well, and good luck during these interviews.”
About Aerviva
Aerviva is a Dubai-based international consultancy, specializing in recruitment services, contract management, staff leasing expertise, personnel and crew leasing & other personalized solutions in aviation consultancy.
Source: Aerviva
Photo Credit: Aerviva
Related Posts
MPS CEO Shares Key Updates on EASA Rulemaking Task 0196 Progress in September 2024
Amsterdam, Netherlands – MPS CEO Philip Adrian FRAeS, a key figure in aviation regulation development, has shared updates on the progress of the EASA Rulemaking Task 0196. The task, which aims to introduce new regulations, has seen significant advancements since the publication of NPA 2020-15 in December 2020, despite the long and intricate process involved.
Check out his article entitled “EASA RMT.0196 and NPA 2020-15: Where Are We Now?” below.
“Implementing new regulations takes years of focused teamwork, a process I am heavily involved in and committed to. Although it has been a while since I updated you on EASA Rulemaking Task 0196, many important steps towards finalization have taken place since publication of NPA 2020-15 in December of 2020. A Focused Consultation just took place last month, so in this blog I will bring you up to speed on developments and give some further insight into the process.
Since I last shared a dedicated blog on this topic, the comment period for NPA 2020-15 opened. This is a lengthy but crucial step in the process. Comments have since been received from National Authorities, affected parties and many individuals. Based on these comments and the Terms of Reference of the team, EASA and the teams have been creating the rule-text and applicable AMC and Guidance material. There are three teams; one team is focused on CS-FSTD, one team is focused on ARA/ORA, and the final team, which I lead, is focused on training.
After working to create the proposed rules, we gathered as a group during the week of June 17th for a Focused Consultation. This was successfully completed with mostly positive comments from participants.
The next steps include additional Focused Consultations on specific items, for example on the final version of CS-FSTD, which is being created by the group led by Olli Hanninen from Traficom, and the opinion from EASA to the European Commission to establish European regulations.
There are already several changes from the original proposal which will have an impact on the training industry. For instance, we have made the change from 12 to 14 features (in coordination with the CS_FSTD team) to ensure better separation between some associated items, such as controls. These have been separated between “Primary Controls Forces and Hardware” and “Primary Flight Controls System ”.
On the training side, we have finished a thorough review of EASA Appendix 9 and have identified the required FCS for each individual task at both the “Training” (T) and “Training to Proficiency” (TP) levels. The TP level replaces the initial proposal of “Testing and Checking” (T&C) and serves as a requirement of FCS to which all training tasks must be completed.
The additional work that has been done by the RMT includes proper incorporation of “Hard Law”, Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material for Competent Authorities with regards to implementation of all these changes.
For the training community, one of the major changes is that unlike before, there will be no time restriction on the use of any specific device. The previous requirement that a Type Rating should be a minimum of 32 hours, of which 16 should be completed in a Full Flight Simulator, is no longer applicable in this proposal, as the FCS rather than the device type will be leading. In essence, this will allow any organization to optimize their training via the Task-to-Tool philosophy and minimize cost while optimizing quality and efficiency. I foresee future Type Ratings to be performed on a multitude of devices, with only the “Pre-Check” and the actual Skill Test being performed in a “heritage” FFS, a significant improvement.
While this work is still ongoing and in the final stages of creation of the Opinion, I do want to take the opportunity to thank those who have contributed to this effort. It has been a long road. We started this effort almost 10 years ago, and it has taken a lot of work from the people below. It is always risky to mention some and not others, but these people deserve the credit for sure:
Francesco Gaetani, Ascanio Russo, Matteo Arnoldi, Nadia Ilieva Prokopis Batzanopoulos and Daan Dousi from EASA, Eric Fuilla-Weishaupt from Airbus, Franziska Scholz from LBA and the previously mentioned Olli Hanninen from Traficom as the team leaders.
Finally, my thanks go out to my training team, with special mention of Frederik Mohrmann (Boeing), Gilad Scherpf (Lufthansa), Steve Gibson (Ryanair)and Christian Norden (Airbus) for their work on the Training Matrices, and many others for their continuous contributions.
If you have any questions after reading this blog, please let me know via the comments below or contact me via LinkedIn and I will gladly address them in person or via a future blog. In the meantime, MPS recently shared some important videos from our friends at Traficom that also further explain the updated framework for FSTD training in detail. Of course, please note, that the final rules may differ from the information in this blog and presented in the videos linked, as the work is still ongoing. In addition, you can also check out our Frequently Asked Questions page.”
Source: MPS
Photo Credit: MPS
Related Posts
VR Flight Simulation Solution Developer and Manufacturer’s FSTDs Authorized for Helicopter Training by EASA
Related Posts
Global Leader in Industrial Virtual and Mixed Reality Solutions, Varjo, Opens New Facility in Finland to Meet Growing Defense Demand
Helsinki, Finland – Varjo, the global leader in industrial virtual and mixed reality solutions, has opened a new secure manufacturing facility in the greater Helsinki region in Finland. This expansion will enable Varjo to meet the increasing demand for its high-resolution XR solutions in defense training and simulation, with a projected total addressable market (TAM) in training simulations alone expected to reach approximately $900 million by 2027.
The new secure manufacturing facility, with full on-site staff, features secure production and warehouse areas, a product and process development area, including reliability testing, and an audio development section.
This milestone is driven by the growing demand from Varjo’s defense customers and the company’s close collaboration with Cole Engineering Services Inc. (CESI), the key contractor for the U.S. Army’s Reconfigurable Virtual Collective Trainer (RVCT) program. Varjo was chosen as the XR technology provider for the RVCT Air program in 2023, enabling a portable training capability for three different helicopters: Apache, Chinook, and Blackhawk.
Eric Carr, Program Director for RVCT at CESI, emphasized the importance of Varjo’s technology in enhancing defense training simulations. “Varjo was selected for the RVCT program because of its ability to provide a mixed reality solution with high-resolution visuals, meeting the demanding requirements of the program. The Varjo XR-4 Secure Edition headsets offer high-resolution imagery for both mixed reality and synthetic environments, and their TAA-compliant manufacturing process makes them ideal for high-security settings.”
Major Brandon Dotson, Assistant Product Manager for the RVCT, highlighted the critical role of XR and VR in military training. “The RVCT uses XR and VR to simulate scenarios like driving tanks and flying helicopters, providing an immersive experience that is crucial for effective training. The whole point of RVCT is to make training easier and accessible to Soldiers at the lowest echelon. Historically, training required large facilities and dedicated teams of contractors, but now we’re pushing that capability down to the Soldier, making it as easy and intuitive as possible to execute training.”
“Varjo’s technology plays a vital role within the U.S. Army’s synthetic training program, providing soldiers with a fully immersive, highly realistic training environment where they can interact with physical controls in real-time. The close partnership between Varjo and CESI has been instrumental in ramping up our new secure manufacturing capability. Our new facility ensures that Varjo can meet the high-security requirements of our governmental customers while supporting the rapid growth of XR demand in the defense sector,” said Timo Toikkanen, Varjo CEO.
Varjo’s commitment to providing the most advanced XR technology for emerging use cases such as training Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTACs) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operators is reinforced by this new facility. By establishing a secure manufacturing base, Varjo is well-positioned to support the evolving needs of defense personnel, ensuring they are well-prepared for the challenges of modern combat.
Source: Varjo
Photo Credit: Varjo
Related Posts
US West Coast Non Profit Flight Training Organisation Takes Delivery of Electric Training Aircraft in September 2024
Related Posts
US College Rocky Mountain College Acquires New ALSIM AL100i Simulator for its Aviation Program
France headquartered flight simulator manufacturer ALSIM is thrilled to announce that Rocky Mountain College, based in Montana, has made a significant acquisition by purchasing the new AL100i simulator for its aviation program.
The AL100i is the exact replica of the P100i, the successful trainer aircraft manufactured by Piper. The simulator will be designed to FTD 5 standard, offering a full-size cockpit replica, a semi-enclosed instructor station, an active electrical control loading, and a specific flight model based on aircraft flight characteristics. The AL100i will feature the immersive 3 projectors visual system for an unequaled 210×55° field of view. On top of this, the simulator will be equipped with the original G3X and GNX375 manufactured by Garmin, ensuring the same level of performance, features, and reliability as the aircraft, a world first for these avionics.
Dan Hargrove, Director of Aviation at Rocky Mountain College, states: “We have added several new Piper 100i training aircraft to our fleet. We pride ourselves in providing excellent Part 141 flight training to our students and truly preparing them for careers in many different sectors of the aviation industry. Many do go on to fly for the airlines, but likewise, others fly cargo, air ambulance, back country Alaska, firefighting, corporate and fractional. We have been looking for some time for a flight training device that is cockpit specific to both successful ease our students into our flight training program and prepare them for a variety of careers. We believe the AL100i is just what we are looking for.”
Jason Da Costa, Business Development and ALSIM Sales Manager, comments: “ALSIM is extremely proud to have been chosen to provide Rocky Mountain College with their brand new AL100i flight training device. Rocky Mountain College needed a solution to provide for the very best in-flight training for their students and with the latest acquisition of several new Piper 100i training aircraft, ALSIM was the perfect choice. ALSIM designs and manufactures flight training devices to allow for the most advanced flight training available anywhere. The AL100i FTD is no exception, its exact replication of the P100i aircraft means that Rocky Mountain College can continue to lead the way in aviation training excellence.”
About Rocky Mountain College
Rocky Mountain College (RMC) is the oldest college in Montana, founded in 1878. Aviation is the largest academic program at a small college with a strong foundation in the liberal arts.
Rocky Mountain College Aviation Program is a four-year, traditional college with many majors, many athletic teams, music, and an emphasis on a liberal arts education and professional preparation. The College finds strength in the mix of “new” aviation and “old” liberal arts and traditions. Students don’t just learn to fly planes, they are leaders, professionals, and thinkers educated with a firm foundation in the liberal arts.
RMC is one of only about 35 colleges and universities accredited by the Aviation Accreditation Board International (AABI). The college counts a total of 150 students in the aviation program, nine aircraft fleet and state-of-the-art glass cockpits which provide the most advanced primary flight training available anywhere. Its location with the Montana weather and terrain helps students develop airmanship skills. Moreover, Rocky Mountain College has bridge programs with multiple airlines and other types of companies that help students get the job they want.
About ALSIM
ALSIM has been developing and manufacturing FAA & EASA certified FNPT II, FNPT II MCC and AATD flight simulators since 1994. Alsim is well recognized for its know-how, based on 30 years of experience. We’re proud to say our hardware & software is made 100% in house, which means peace of mind for our customers. Alsim’s main objective relies on innovation: we aim to anticipate our client’s needs and remain at the cutting edge of technology.
Today, we have more than 450 devices installed and certified in over 60 countries, with over 400 clients.
Source: ALSIM
Photo Credit: ALSIM